Case 2402720/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Wade Kewley v Roofing Insulation Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402720/2022
- Decision date
- 11 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Wade Kewley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 6 July 2022, Employment Judge Aspinall heard Mr Wade Kewley's claim against Roofing Insulation Services Limited. The only claim recorded in the judgment was for a statutory redundancy payment.
The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim for a statutory redundancy payment succeeded. It also recorded that the respondent did not defend the complaint and agreed the amount awarded, which was £408.13.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The accompanying interest notice records the relevant judgment day as 11 July 2022 and explains the tribunal's standard interest arrangements, but no separate interest amount was awarded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim succeeded. The respondent did not defend the complaint and agreed the amount awarded of £408.13. | Upheld | — | £408 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £408
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.