Case 2402731/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steven Sloan v Represented by:15 Ms R Kochar GXO Logistics UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402731/2022
- Decision date
- 17 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- chambers in Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steven Sloan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Steven Sloan presented his ET1 on 21 April 2022 after ACAS early conciliation between 9 and 24 March 2022. He complained of unfair dismissal said to have taken place on 15 December 2021, together with claims for failure to pay notice pay and holiday pay. The claim was sent to the respondents on 13 May 2022, but they did not present a response by the due date of 10 June 2022 or at all.
Applying Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, the Employment Judge decided that liability could properly be determined on the available material without a hearing. The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay notice pay, and failure to pay holiday pay all succeed.
The judgment does not assess compensation. Remedy was expressly left to a separate remedy hearing, and the claimant's solicitor was directed to submit a detailed schedule of loss within 14 days of the judgment, with supporting documentation including evidence of mitigation and an explanation of the sums claimed for each successful head of complaint.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Determined on the papers under Rule 21 after no ET3 response; remedy deferred to a separate hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for failure to pay notice pay; liability succeeded and remedy was deferred. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for failure to pay holiday pay; liability succeeded and remedy was deferred. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.