Case 2402737/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Fernandes v Lancashire County Cricket Club — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402737/2022
- Decision date
- 11 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Fernandes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dealt only with a claim for unfair dismissal. By letter dated 09 June 2023, it gave Mr E Fernandes an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds of insufficient service and because it had not been actively pursued.
Mr Fernandes did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Judge Ross struck out the unfair dismissal claim. The judgment records no merits determination and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim after a letter dated 09 June 2023 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The stated grounds were insufficient service for the unfair dismissal claim and that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.