Case 2402744/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Lawrence Ms L Yates v Square Health Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402744/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Lawrence Ms L Yates
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters dated 10 July 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal Orders made at or following the preliminary hearing on 2 May 2023 and/or because the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the claims.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 30 September to 4 October 2024 would not take place. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out after the claimants failed to make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the Tribunal's letters dated 10 July 2024. The judgment recorded non-compliance with Tribunal Orders made at or following the preliminary hearing on 2 May 2023 and/or that the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Struck out after the claimants failed to make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the Tribunal's letters dated 10 July 2024. The judgment recorded non-compliance with Tribunal Orders made at or following the preliminary hearing on 2 May 2023 and/or that the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out after the claimants failed to make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the Tribunal's letters dated 10 July 2024. The judgment recorded non-compliance with Tribunal Orders made at or following the preliminary hearing on 2 May 2023 and/or that the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.