Case 2402758/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Alison Core v Hampton’s Emporium (trading as Stanleys Fruit Stores) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402758/2024
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dennehy Case
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Alison Core
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester Employment Tribunal hearing on 14 November 2024, the parties agreed by consent that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,790 and to breach of contract notice pay of £1,860. The judgment recorded those sums as gross amounts, making a total gross award of £4,650 payable within 28 days of the date of judgment.
The claimant's separate claim for unauthorised deductions of wages, brought under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period 03 February 2024 to 20 March 2024, was dismissed as not well founded. The judgment also records that the respondent was entitled to deduct income tax and national insurance contributions before making payment to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | By consent, the parties agreed the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,790, calculated as 18 x £155 average wage. | Settled | — | £2,790 |
| Breach of contract | By consent, the parties agreed the claimant was entitled to notice pay of £1,860, calculated as a gross weekly wage of £155 x 12 weeks. | Settled | — | £1,860 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions of wages under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996, for the period 03 February 2024 to 20 March 2024, was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,650
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.