Case 2402764/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Lord Miss L Lord v The Trustees of the Lees and Hey Conservative Club — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402764/2019
- Decision date
- 24 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Lord Miss L Lord
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's title and held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaints in respect of arrears of pay, notice pay and holiday pay. Those complaints were therefore not determined on their merits in this judgment.
The only substantive relief recorded was redundancy pay. The tribunal found it was just and equitable that each claimant should receive a redundancy payment and set out the calculation for each. Mr D Lord had 18 years' service, contractual pay of £408.00 per week, and a redundancy payment of £11,016. Miss L Lord had 19 years' service, contractual pay of £86.13 per week, and a redundancy payment of £1,636.47.
No discrimination, dismissal, whistleblowing, or other separate liability findings are recorded in the judgment text provided. The bottom-line monetary awards shown in the judgment are the two redundancy payments, totalling £12,652.47.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mr D Lord. The tribunal held it was just and equitable that he receive a redundancy payment. Length of service: 18 years. Rate of pay: £8.50 per hour. Contractual hours: 48 per week. Contractual pay: £408.00 per week. Redundancy payment calculated as £408 x 18 x 1.5 = £11,016. | Upheld | — | £11,016 |
| Redundancy | Miss L Lord. The tribunal held it was just and equitable that she receive a redundancy payment. Length of service: 19 years. Rate of pay: £7.83 per hour. Contractual hours: 11 per week. Contractual pay: £86.13 per week. Redundancy payment calculated as £86.13 x 19 x 1 = £1,636.47. | Upheld | — | £1,636 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,652
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.