Case 2402776/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Romek v The Urban Tech Group Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402776/2024
- Decision date
- 29 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Romek
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 29 July 2024, Employment Judge Buzzard issued a Rule 21 judgment in the absence of a response. The tribunal found that The Urban Tech Group Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs K Romek's wages and holiday pay and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £3,364.57.
The judgment did not provide a separate breakdown between wages and holiday pay, so the award is recorded as a single combined sum. The hearing listed for 13 September 2024 was cancelled. A separate interest notice stated that interest may be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award is not paid within 14 days, with 29 July 2024 as the relevant decision day and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the order refers to wages and holiday pay together and does not split the award between them. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,365
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.