Case 2402781/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr J Johnson v Adecco UK Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2402781/2022
Decision date: 5 June 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ainscough

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Johnson

Respondent

Adecco UK Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Ainscough, sitting alone in chambers at Liverpool, struck out two disability discrimination claims under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because they had no reasonable prospect of success.

The struck-out claims were a failure to make reasonable adjustments claim under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010, and a discrimination arising from disability claim under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 based on removal from assignment on 23 December 2021. The written judgment records that oral reasons were given and does not make any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospect of success.	Struck out	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, concerning removal from assignment on 23 December 2021, was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospect of success.	Struck out	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.