Case 2402784/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sikandar Ali Hussain v Eclipse Autoparts Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402784/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sikandar Ali Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Sikandar Ali Hussain brought claims against Eclipse Autoparts Limited for unpaid holiday pay on termination and unpaid wages for the period to 28 March 2022. Employment Judge Buzzard, sitting alone at Manchester by video hearing on 5 December 2022, found both claims well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £400 in respect of unpaid holiday pay, described in the judgment as two weeks gross pay. It also ordered payment of £800 for unpaid wages, described as four weeks gross pay. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay on termination of employment succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £400, described as two weeks gross pay. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages for the period to 28 March 2022 succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £800, described as four weeks gross pay. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.