Case 2402790/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L B Sailsbury v Solace Hairdressing Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402790/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L B Sailsbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L B Sailsbury brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Solace Hairdressing Ltd. No response was entered by the respondent, so the tribunal entered a liability judgment in the claimant's favour under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim succeeds. It does not set out substantive findings on the underlying dismissal facts or legal analysis in this liability decision.
The tribunal recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability judgment entered under Rule 21 because no response was entered by the respondent. The tribunal stated that the claim succeeds and that remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.