Case 2402793/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Cook v Liverpool Street Scene Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402793/2019
- Decision date
- 26 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Cook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting remotely in Manchester before Employment Judge Sharkett, heard the case on 28, 29 and 30 April and 18 May 2021. The claimant, Mr S Cook, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The judgment records that all three claims were dismissed. The claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal was found not well founded and was dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and the claim for payment in lieu of holidays accrued but not taken at the date of termination was likewise found not well founded and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal recorded the claim as one of constructive unfair dismissal and held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for payment in lieu of holidays accrued but not taken at termination was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.