Case 2402800/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Stone v Martin Ainscough Farms Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402800/2024
- Decision date
- 12 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Stone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 25 July 2024, the tribunal gave Miss E Stone an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The stated basis was that she did not have the relevant two years' service required to claim unfair dismissal.
Miss Stone did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 8 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the tribunal considered the claimant did not have the relevant two years' service to claim unfair dismissal and she did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning letter dated 25 July 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.