Case 2402821/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Petrila and Mr A Bastic v Café Terrazzo Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402821/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Hodgson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Petrila and Mr A Bastic
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Carlisle on 21 October 2019 before Employment Judge B Hodgson. Neither claimant appeared or was represented, and neither did the respondent. The judgment records that, because the claimants failed to appear or be represented at the hearing, the claims were dismissed.
The short judgment contains no findings on the merits of the underlying complaints. It does not identify any witness evidence, legal analysis, or remedy calculation. The public listing for the decision records unlawful deduction from wages and working time as the case categories, but the judgment text itself does not expand on those heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claimants failed to appear or be represented at the hearing. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the pleaded issues; the gov.uk listing for the decision records unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed because the claimants failed to appear or be represented at the hearing. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the pleaded issues; the gov.uk listing for the decision records working time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.