Case 2402843/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Melman v City District Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402843/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Melman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Manchester Employment Tribunals on 10 April 2021. No response was entered within the required time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Mr R Melman was unfairly dismissed by City District Limited (in administration). The judgment records that determination only and does not set out any separate remedy figure in the extracted text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Determined under rule 21 after no response was entered within the required time. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.