Case 2402852/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Knight Miss I Knight v Robert James Fitted Furniture Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402852/2024
- Decision date
- 25 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Knight Miss I Knight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phil Allen gave a Rule 21 judgment for both claimants against Robert James Fitted Furniture Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation). For Miss C Knight, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £344.30 gross, and also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement, ordering £509.25.
For Miss I Knight, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £169.40 gross, and also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement, ordering £378.30. The awards in the judgment total £1,401.25 across both claimants.
The written record also included the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest is payable if the sums remain unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, at 8% per annum. No separate quantified interest award appears in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Miss C Knight: respondent ordered to pay the gross sum of £344.30. | Upheld | — | £344 |
| Holiday pay | Miss C Knight: respondent ordered to pay £509.25 for failed payment of holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £509 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Miss I Knight: respondent ordered to pay the gross sum of £169.40. | Upheld | — | £169 |
| Holiday pay | Miss I Knight: respondent ordered to pay £378.30 for failed payment of holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £378 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,401
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.