Case 2402857/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Hugill v Veterans into Logistics — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402857/2023
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mrs AL Booth, Mrs P Owen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Hugill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 20, 21 and 22 August 2024 before Employment Judge M Butler, with Mrs AL Booth and Mrs P Owen sitting as the lay members. It unanimously dismissed the claimant's whistleblowing detriment claim, which alleged detriments on the grounds of having made protected disclosures, and it also dismissed the claim that she had been automatically unfairly dismissed for having made protected disclosures.
The written judgment records that, for the avoidance of doubt, all claims brought in the case failed and were dismissed. The document is a short written record of the tribunal's decision and does not set out separate written reasons or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim that the claimant was subject to detriments on the grounds of having made protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim that the claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed for having made protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.