Case 2402872/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Hurst v Irwell Valley Housing Association Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402872/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Hurst
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Hurst brought claims of unlawful discrimination on the protected characteristic of disability against Irwell Valley Housing Association Limited. The case was heard in Manchester on 29 September 2021 before Employment Judge Sharkett; the claimant did not attend and the respondent was represented by Ms A Gumbs of Counsel.
The tribunal's written judgment records that the disability discrimination claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No findings on liability were made beyond that procedural disposal, and no remedy was awarded.
The judgment also notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written record itself does not set out any substantive factual findings or legal test beyond the withdrawal-based disposal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states that the claimant's claims of unlawful discrimination on the protected characteristic of disability were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.