Case 2402872/2023 · Employment Tribunal
F Fawcett v Evolve Digital UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402872/2023
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
F Fawcett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge M Butler found that Evolve Digital UK Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,575.00. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the net sum of £627.38.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement outstanding on termination of employment and ordered payment of the gross sum of £51.78. The judgment records the case as joined with 2402871/2023, 2402873/2023 and 2402773/2023, and it gives the relevant decision day for interest as 11 July 2023 with a stipulated rate of 8%, but it does not set out any separate interest award in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,575 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the net sum of £627.38. | Upheld | — | £627 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday entitlement was outstanding on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £52 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,254
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.