Case 2402883/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Andrews v Isupply Training Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402883/2023
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Andrews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the matter could properly be determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal determined the claim on the papers rather than at the listed hearing, which was cancelled.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deduction from wages. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £199.
The tribunal also dealt with a separate issue concerning pension contributions not made to the relevant scheme. It held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider that claim, and noted that the claim form suggested the issue was being addressed by the Pensions Regulator. The judgment was dated 17 May 2023, and the accompanying notice stated that statutory interest would apply if the award remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, at the stipulated rate of 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £199. | Upheld | — | £199 |
| Other | The tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim for pension contributions not made to the relevant scheme, and noted that from the claim form it appeared to be being addressed by the Pensions Regulator. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £199
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.