Case 2402891/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Norris v Garston Animal Rescue — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402891/2021
- Decision date
- 12 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss V Norris, brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Garston Animal Rescue. The case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 1 October 2021 and 11 October 2021 before Employment Judge McDonald sitting alone.
The tribunal dismissed the unlawful deductions from wages claim. It separately found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment in breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
No monetary award was made. The tribunal said that entitlement to an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 did not arise because the unlawful deductions claim failed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claim. It also found a breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to the written statement of particulars, but held that no award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 arose because the unlawful deductions claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.