Case 2402900/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Odularu v Randstad Group UK and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402900/2024
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms N Odularu
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 17 May 2024. The second respondent, Peterson James & Co Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 21. The judgment records that the second respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £4,103.40 gross.
The first respondent, Randstad Group UK, had presented a valid response and the claim against it was listed for hearing on 20 November 2024. The judgment states that the rule 21 decision was issued only against the second respondent and not against the first respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment against the second respondent only. The tribunal found that Peterson James & Co Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £4,103.40 gross. The claim against the first respondent was not determined in this judgment and remained listed for hearing. | Upheld | — | £4,103 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,103
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.