Case 2402911/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Y Chung v Bonkers90BGH Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402911/2024
- Decision date
- 31 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Y Chung
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment in Miss K Y Chung's claim against Bonkers90BGH Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The order required the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,997.50. No separate breakdown of the award was provided, and the hearing listed for 25 November 2024 was cancelled.
The written record also included the standard Tribunal notice on interest, stating the relevant decision day as 30 October 2024, the calculation day as 31 October 2024, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum if the sum remains unpaid after 14 days. No separate interest amount was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum. The hearing listed for 25 November 2024 was cancelled. | Upheld | — | £3,998 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,998
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.