Case 2402917/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Hodgson v Bell Sons & Co (Druggist) Ltd (Ashlie Green) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402917/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Hodgson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr B Hodgson brought proceedings against Bell Sons & Co (Druggists) Limited under case number 2402917/2019. It is a short judgment and does not set out the factual background, evidence, or any findings on the merits of the pleaded complaints.
The tribunal stated that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No liability findings, legal analysis, or monetary award are recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy figure is given.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment text does not enumerate the pleaded claims, so this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment text does not enumerate the pleaded claims, so this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.