Case 2402924/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Felton v Surface Magic Repairs Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402924/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Felton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ainscough sat alone at Manchester on 19 July 2019. The tribunal upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim and found that he was entitled to receive notice pay under the employment contract for the period 16 January 2019 to 16 February 2019. The judgment also recorded that the claimant was absent from work through ill health during that period and was therefore only entitled to statutory sick pay during the notice period.
The tribunal dismissed the claim for compensation in relation to outstanding annual leave under Regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It found that the respondent was lawfully entitled under Regulation 14(4) of those Regulations to deduct the equivalent of 2.25 days' pay from the claimant's pay during the notice period to reflect leave taken in excess of the proportion of the leave year that had expired when employment ended.
The unlawful deduction from wages claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal did not fix the final monetary amount in the judgment and stated that the amount to be paid by way of remedy would be determined after the parties had taken account of any written representations by 26 July 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim and found the claimant was entitled to receive notice pay under the employment contract for the period 16 January 2019 to 16 February 2019. It recorded that he was absent through ill health during that period and was therefore only entitled to statutory sick pay during the notice period. No monetary figure was fixed in the judgment; remedy was left for later determination. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The claim for compensation in relation to outstanding annual leave under Regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed. The tribunal found the respondent was lawfully entitled under Regulation 14(4) to deduct the equivalent of 2.25 days' pay from the claimant's pay during the notice period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14(4) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.