Case 2402924/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Calderbank v Crowdsurf Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402924/2024
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Calderbank
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs K Calderbank against Crowdsurf Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation). It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £23,956.24.
It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £7,437.50. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s accrued annual leave entitlement on termination of employment, assessed at 6.28 days, and ordered payment of £1,690.54.
The judgment therefore ordered the respondent to pay a total gross sum of £33,084.28. The accompanying interest notice stated that the relevant decision day was 26 September 2024 and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum, but the judgment did not quantify any separate interest amount.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £23,956 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £7,438 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued annual leave entitlement on termination of employment, stated as 6.28 days. | Upheld | — | £1,691 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £33,084
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.