Case 2402941/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Butler v Capita plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402941/2023
- Decision date
- 17 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Butler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that the claim form did not disclose an automatic unfair dismissal complaint based on protected disclosures, and the claimant was not permitted to amend the claim to add one. The complaints of breach of contract (wrongful dismissal), unpaid accrued holiday pay, and other previously withdrawn complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The ordinary unfair dismissal claim was upheld. The Tribunal found that the respondent had established the Burchell elements and that any appeal would inevitably have upheld the decision to dismiss, but it also found real procedural unfairness because the allegations and outcome letter lacked sufficient clarity and the appeal process did not correct that problem.
The Tribunal held that any compensatory award would be reduced to nil under the Polkey principle because the claimant would inevitably have been fairly dismissed had a fair process been followed. The claimant was entitled to a basic award, reduced by 50% because the Tribunal found culpable conduct contributed to the dismissal; the amount was not calculated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The ordinary unfair dismissal complaint under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The claimant was entitled to a basic award reduced by 50%, but the judgment did not calculate the amount. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a complaint of breach of contract (wrongful dismissal) and says it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of unpaid accrued holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Earlier case management correspondence identified an unauthorised deduction from wages complaint; the judgment states all other complaints had previously been dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Burchell test
- band of reasonable responses
- Polkey principle
- s.122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.