Case 2402944/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss X Klucznik v KRO Hotels, Velvet Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402944/2023
- Decision date
- 12 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss X Klucznik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered only the claimant's redundancy payment complaint. It held that section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to present such a claim, and found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claimant was not entitled to bring the redundancy payment complaint. It also recorded that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason, despite having been given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.
The claim for a redundancy payment was therefore struck out. The judgment expressly states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant was employed for less than two years, so the tribunal held she was not entitled to bring a redundancy payment complaint under s.155 ERA 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.155 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.