Case 2402952/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Owen v Evolve Transport and Logistics Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402952/2024
- Decision date
- 25 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Owen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response in time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the material before the tribunal, the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,100 for the wage deduction. The written record also included the standard interest notice stating that interest would be payable if the award remained unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, but no separate interest amount was set out in the judgment.
The complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay did not proceed on the merits because it was withdrawn by the claimant and recorded as dismissed. The hearing listed for 28 November 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,100. | Upheld | — | £3,100 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay was recorded as dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.