Case 2402953/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Munroe v Prosperity Children’s Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402953/2023
- Decision date
- 18 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Thompson
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Munroe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints against Prosperity Children's Services Limited. Employment Judge Thompson, sitting alone at Manchester Employment Tribunal, recorded that the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The judgment also recorded that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not include further findings or a remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures and records that it was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.