Case 2402963/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Saloo v Parrott & Coales LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402963/2023
- Decision date
- 6 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Saloo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the North West Employment Tribunals on 23 February 2023. The Respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,362.94 gross. It also found that the Respondent had failed to consult with the Claimant under regulations 13 and 14 of the TUPE Regulations 2006 and ordered payment of £5,168.02.
The total sum ordered was £8,530.36. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or other remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,362.94 gross under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £3,363 |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to consult with the Claimant under regulations 13 and 14 of the TUPE Regulations 2006 and ordered payment of £5,168.02. | Upheld | — | £5,168 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,530
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.