Case 2402973/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Hale v Edge 360 Engagement CIC — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402973/2021
- Decision date
- 13 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Hale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms R Hale was an employee of Edge 360 Engagement CIC from 1 February 2021. It refused the claimant’s application to amend the claim to add a complaint for notice pay.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unauthorised deductions claim in respect of wages due from 1 March 2021 to 11 March 2021 inclusive and ordered the respondent to pay £1,184.61, described as the total gross sum deducted. It also upheld the claim for payment in lieu of agreed but untaken annual leave on termination of employment and ordered payment of £323.07, described as the gross sum due.
The tribunal dismissed the part of the unauthorised deductions complaint relating to alleged unpaid expenses, holding that it did not have jurisdiction to hear that claim. The judgment records no separate award for the dismissed expenses issue. The bottom-line monetary awards therefore total £1,507.68, with the written notice referring to the statutory interest regime if sums are not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions claim succeeded in respect of wages due from 1 March 2021 to 11 March 2021 inclusive. | Upheld | — | £1,185 |
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded in respect of payment in lieu of agreed but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £323 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim regarding alleged unpaid expenses was dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,508
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.