Case 2402982/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Raymond Doran v Seddon Foods Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402982/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kathryn Gibson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Raymond Doran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Kathryn Gibson heard the matter in Manchester on 30 and 31 August 2023. After hearing from the parties' representatives, the tribunal recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement at the hearing and made an order by consent.
The respondent agreed to pay the claimant £1,000 in full and final settlement of the above claim. The order states that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply. Payment was to be made within 28 days, by 4pm on 28 September 2023.
The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text does not identify the underlying pleaded claim type(s) beyond the case reference, so the disposal is recorded as a settlement by consent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records a consent order settling 'the above claim' in full and final settlement. The extracted text does not identify the pleaded claim type(s) beyond that case reference. | Settled | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.