Case 2402994/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Hannah-O’Donnell v Coulson & Collins Care Home Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402994/2021
- Decision date
- 8 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Hannah-O’Donnell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Manchester by CVP on 29 October 2021 before Employment Judge Johnson. The tribunal held that Mr W Hannah-O’Donnell had been unfairly dismissed by Coulson & Collins Care Home Limited, and recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint was successful.
The claimant also had complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay. Both were dismissed at the hearing because the claimant withdrew them. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on those withdrawn complaints beyond the withdrawal.
Compensation for the successful unfair dismissal complaint was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that compensation would be dealt with at a later remedy hearing to be listed for three hours in the Manchester Employment Tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and recorded that this complaint was successful. Compensation was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This complaint was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | This complaint was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.