Case 2402995/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Lords Roofing Contractors (NW) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402995/2020
- Decision date
- 2 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phil Allen sat alone and heard the claim remotely by CVP on 19 February 2021. The respondent was not represented and had submitted no response, and the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 on the claimant's evidence.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay £900 in respect of that entitlement.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract of employment in respect of notice. It awarded £500 as damages for that breach and ordered both sums to be paid within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £900 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.