Case 2402997/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Houghton v Washroom Services NW Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402997/2020
- Decision date
- 29 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Houghton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Miss D Houghton succeeded in her claim for a statutory redundancy payment under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also recorded that she succeeded in her claim to be paid in respect of annual leave and/or compensation in relation to entitlement to leave under regulations 16 and/or 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The judgment did not set out any remedy figure. Instead, it stated that the case would be listed for remedy in due course, so the decision on liability was recorded separately from any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal stated that the claimant succeeded in her claim for a statutory redundancy payment under section 135 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal stated that the claimant succeeded in her claim to be paid in respect of annual leave and/or compensation in relation to entitlement to leave under regulations 16 and/or 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.