Case 2403024/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Sheridan v Yubo Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403024/2023
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Sheridan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, proceeding under Rule 21, found that Yubo Ltd had made an unauthorized deduction from Mrs P Sheridan's wages in respect of November 2022. It ordered the respondent to pay £866.70 gross for that claim. It also found that the claimant had not been compensated for untaken annual leave on termination and ordered £213 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorized deduction from wages and ordered payment of £866.70 gross for unpaid wages for November 2022. | Upheld | — | £867 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to compensate the claimant for untaken annual leave on termination and ordered £213 gross. | Upheld | — | £213 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the contract by failing to give notice of termination and awarded £1,918.89 gross damages, treated in the notes as Post-Employment Notice Pay for tax purposes. | Upheld | — | £1,919 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,665.13. | Upheld | — | £2,665 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,664
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.