Case 2403026/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Puentes v Wine and Wallop Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403026/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Puentes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response. The claimant, Mr S Puentes, had worked as a chef for Wine and Wallop Ltd from 14 September 2022 to 5 November 2022. The tribunal recorded that on 5 October 2022 the respondent paid him for 14 days' work even though he had worked 16 days, leaving 2 days' wages unpaid, which the respondent had said would be paid the following month.
The tribunal found that on termination the claimant was owed 2 days' wages, equating to £146 gross, and that this amount was not paid. It therefore upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered the respondent to pay £146 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had accrued 4 days' annual leave on termination, including 2 days that had been deducted in November 2022, equating to £292 gross. It upheld the claim for accrued holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £292 gross. The notice attached to the judgment stated that interest is payable if the award remains unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, which was 25 July 2023, with the calculation day being 26 July 2023 and the stipulated rate 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay wages between 4 November 2022 and 5 November 2022 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £146. | Upheld | — | £146 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay accrued annual leave on termination and ordered payment of the gross sum of £292 under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £292 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £438
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.