Case 2403062/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Stretch v Love Energy Savings.com Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403062/2023
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fearon REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Stretch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge Fearon, heard the case on 16 and 17 October 2023 and gave judgment orally at the hearing. The written record states that Ms E Stretch's complaint of unfair dismissal against Love Energy Savings.com Limited was not well founded.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, and it notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the usual tribunal process.
No monetary award is recorded, and no separate remedy findings are set out in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in this record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.