Case 2403097/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Bain-Hall v Rosa Bolton Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403097/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Bain-Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 2 March 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Rosa Bolton Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in respect of unpaid wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr L Bain-Hall £387.13 gross within 21 days of the date of judgment, the amount being identified as 40.75 hours' pay at an hourly rate of £9.50.
The judgment also contained the standard interest notice. It stated that the relevant decision day was 27 June 2023, the calculation day was 28 June 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum. No separate quantified interest award was set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £387.13 gross, said to represent 40.75 hours' pay at £9.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £387 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £387
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.