Case 2403106/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bentham v Clearfume UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403106/2022
- Decision date
- 15 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bentham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Anderson sitting alone, via telephone, with no attendance by the Respondent. The tribunal recorded that all of the Claimant’s claims were brought within the relevant time limit.
The tribunal found that the Claimant’s claims for failure to pay a redundancy payment, unlawful deduction from wages, unlawful deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay, and breach of contract in respect of notice pay were well founded. No discrimination or other protected-characteristic issue arose on the face of the judgment.
The Respondent was ordered to pay gross sums of £329.55 for redundancy payment, £792.00 for unpaid wages, £731.08 for unpaid holiday pay, and £2,193.24 as damages for notice pay. The total award recorded by the tribunal was £4,045.87.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £330 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £792 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £731 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,193 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,046
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.