Case 2403140/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Abisai v Eat Meat Halal Steakhouse — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403140/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Abisai
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Batten found that Eat Meat Halal Steakhouse had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms N Abisai's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £897.05.
The written judgment contains no further findings of fact or liability issues beyond the unauthorised deduction finding, and it does not break the award into separate heads of loss. A separate notice explains the operation of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 and states the relevant decision day as 29 July 2020, with the calculation day as 30 July 2020 and a stipulated interest rate of 8%, but no separate interest amount is set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £897.05. The judgment does not split the award into separate components. | Upheld | — | £897 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £897
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.