Case 2403142/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Emma Daulby v MZ Build Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403142/2023
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Greer REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Emma Daulby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Manchester (Hybrid) before Employment Judge Greer under Rule 21, with the claimant appearing in person and no appearance for the respondent. The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay on 14 November 2022, contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was well-founded.
The tribunal ordered MZ Build Ltd to pay Ms Emma Daulby the gross sum of £5,330.64. The written record also included the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest would be payable if the sum was not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, with the relevant decision day identified as 1 November 2023 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay on 14 November 2022 contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,330.64. | Upheld | — | £5,331 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,331
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.