Case 2403154/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hussain v Raina Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403154/2023
- Decision date
- 28 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeny Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester hearing on 26 April 2023, Employment Judge Feeny recorded a single successful claim by Mr M Hussain against Raina Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Hashim, described as a business administrator.
The tribunal's judgment states that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered Raina Ltd to pay Mr Hussain £1,188.51, stated to be gross of deductions for tax and national insurance.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard notice. No separate apportionment of the award, interest figure, or additional remedy is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,188.51 gross of deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,189 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,189
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.