Case 2403156/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Singh-Roud v RG Recruitment Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2403156/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Singh-Roud
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented by the respondent. The tribunal dealt with the claim on the papers and did not record any findings on discrimination or dismissal issues.
The claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted payments due to the claimant in respect of one month's wages, in the net sum of £1,564.38, for the period February to March 2020.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,564.38 net and stated that the respondent should account to HMRC for the appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance on the gross sum. The judgment was accompanied by the standard notice on statutory interest, but no separate interest figure was assessed in the decision itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded and ordered payment of the net sum. | Upheld | — | £1,564 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,564
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.