Case 2403170/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Forrest v Elysium Healthcare Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2403170/2020
- Decision date
- 28 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Forrest
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a registered nurse working nights at the respondent's hospital, was dismissed after allegations that she had fallen asleep while undertaking level 3 observations of a vulnerable patient. The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed her for misconduct, a potentially fair reason, and genuinely believed she had been asleep during observations.
The tribunal found procedural unfairness because the respondent did not interview a relevant colleague about the key period and did not give the claimant an opportunity to review the enhanced CCTV footage relied on at the disciplinary hearing. Given the seriousness of the allegation and its possible effect on the claimant's nursing career, those omissions affected the fairness of the dismissal.
The tribunal also found, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant had fallen asleep intermittently while undertaking observations. It concluded that dismissal for that conduct was within the range of reasonable responses, that the procedural failings would have made no difference to the outcome, and that it was just and equitable to reduce both the basic and compensatory awards by 100%.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well founded because of procedural unfairness, but reduced both the basic and compensatory awards by 100%, so no remedy was payable. | Upheld | — | £0 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
14 references- s.98(2) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell
- Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones
- Foley v Post Office
- Midland Bank plc v Madden
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets v Hitt
- Shrestha v Genesis Housing Association Limited
- Santamera v Express Cargo Forwarding
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- s.123 ERA 1996
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Limited
- s.122(2) ERA 1996
- s.123(6) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.