Case 2403182/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Trii v Carve Lab Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403182/2023
- Decision date
- 5 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Members
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr P Stowe, Mr TD Wilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Trii
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 2 and 3 April 2024 before Employment Judge Howard, sitting with members Mr P Stowe and Mr TD Wilson. Both parties were represented in person.
The judgment records that Miss K Trii's claims of unlawful deduction from wages, unpaid accrued holiday, detriment and constructive unfair dismissal because of making protected disclosures, and failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars all failed and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim listed by the tribunal and dismissed in the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid accrued holiday listed by the tribunal and dismissed in the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriment because of making protected disclosures was listed and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claim for constructive unfair dismissal because of making protected disclosures was listed and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars was listed and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.