Case 2403206/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Ramsbottom v University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust HELD AT: Manchester (by video hearing) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403206/2024
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Ramsbottom
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Manchester on 22 November 2024, before Employment Judge Slater, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal dealt only with the claimant's application for reconsideration of the earlier decision not to accept the claim on the basis that it contained no complaint within the tribunal's jurisdiction.
The application was refused. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the judgment. The decision sent to the parties on 26 November 2024 therefore records only the refusal of reconsideration and does not determine any substantive employment claim or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal refused the claimant's application for reconsideration of the earlier decision not to accept the claim because it contained no complaint the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider. No substantive merits claim was determined in this decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.