Case 2403223/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Walsingham Support — 2021
- Case reference
- 2403223/2017
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn proceedings against Walsingham Support, Employment Judge Batten gave the claimant a letter dated 1 July 2021 offering an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claim appeared to have no reasonable prospects of success in light of Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson Blake and another and that it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim on 13 August 2021, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 18 August 2021. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The short judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded label in the extracted text; the classification is inferred from the gov.uk listing context ('Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Working Time Regulations') and the reference to Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson Blake and another. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson Blake and another
- no reasonable prospects of success
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.