Case 2403236/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Madden v Born & Bread Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403236/2020
- Decision date
- 21 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Madden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 without a hearing. The tribunal held that Mr A Madden was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,008.69. It also found that Born & Bread Ltd breached the claimant’s contract by failing to give notice of termination and ordered damages of £360.69.
The tribunal further found that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages for January 2020 and ordered payment of £1,457.73. It also found an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s holiday pay and ordered payment of £672.79.
The judgment states that all sums are awarded gross without any deduction for tax or national insurance. The notice on interest explains that interest may accrue if the award remains unpaid after the relevant decision day, which was 21 December 2020, but no separate interest figure is set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,009 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant’s contract by failing to give notice of termination and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £361 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This claim related to an unlawful deduction from wages for January 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,458 |
| Holiday pay | This claim related to an unlawful deduction from holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £673 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.