Case 2403246/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Rasool v Safe Hands Care and Support Services — 2025
- Case reference
- 2403246/2024
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Cowen REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Rasool
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Rasool was employed by Safe Hands Care and Support Services from 4 March 2024 until 2 April 2024. He brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal identified three disputed points: the number of hours worked, whether shadowing should be paid at half rate, and whether mileage was owed.
The tribunal accepted the respondent's records on hours worked and found that the claimant worked 63.5 hours. It also accepted the respondent's evidence that shadowing at the start of employment was paid at half the normal rate. On that basis, it calculated that the claimant was entitled to £661.67 for his employment.
Bank statements showed that the respondent had already paid £531.32, leaving £130.35 outstanding. The tribunal found that this balance remained unpaid and held that there had been an unlawful deduction from wages in that sum. It recorded that this was a gross amount and that any tax consequences would depend on the claimant's other earnings.
The tribunal did not accept the mileage element of the claim. Although it accepted that the claimant would have done some driving as part of his work, it found there was no evidence showing the distance travelled, when it was travelled, or what mileage expense was incurred. It therefore found no unlawful deduction in relation to mileage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the wages claim to the extent of £130.35. It rejected the separate mileage element for want of evidence and accepted the respondent's evidence that the shortfall was a clerical error. | Upheld | — | £130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £130
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 13(3) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.